RE: RAT I could not have made a bigger blunder if I tired

["Sylvain, John" <jsylvain@station.sony.com>]

See! You did it again. You meant to say "genius" and instead you said
"goose".

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	NashGay@aol.com [SMTP:NashGay@aol.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, March 04, 1999 7:51 PM
> To:	rat-list@whirl-i-gig.com
> Subject:	Re: RAT I could not have made a bigger blunder if I tired
> 
> No, you goose.  The lesson is proof it ONE MORE TIME before hitting
> "Send."
> 
> In a message dated 3/4/99 7:49:44 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> jsylvain@station.sony.com writes:
> 
> << 
>  That is funny!
>  
>  The lesson here: Don't rewrite too much.
>  
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From:	NashGay@aol.com [SMTP:NashGay@aol.com]
>  > Sent:	Thursday, March 04, 1999 7:45 PM
>  > To:	rat-list@whirl-i-gig.com
>  > Subject:	RAT I could not have made a bigger blunder if I tired
>  > 
>  > Oh, my god.  I really did post the below!  What a dumbfuck.  Would you
>  > believe
>  > me if while editing and re-editing and simplifying and whatever, I
>  > actually
>  > didnt' catch that I said :
>  > 
>  > >"I don't think any of us should kid
>  >  > ourselves
>  >  > that there is such a thing as good and bad art.  And that most of us
>  > know
>  >  > the
>  >  > difference. 
>  > 
>  > WHAT AN ASSHOLE I AM!!!!
>  > I SWEAR TO GOD IT WAS SUPPOSED TO SAY "I dont' think any of us should
> kid
>  > ourselves into believing that there ISN"T such a thing as good and bad
>  > art."
>  > 
>  > I believe there is bad art.  Oh, me oh my!  And I've seen TONS of it.
> So,
>  > let
>  > the record show I'm an idiot who can't proofread.  Not an idiot who
>  > believes
>  > no one could or should judge art to be good or bad.
>  > 
>  > Oy!
>  > 
>  > << 
>  >  > I agree with the implication that RAT should steer clear of letting
> in
>  > and
>  >  > keeping out good and bad art.  I don't think any of us should kid
>  >  > ourselves
>  >  > that there is such a thing as good and bad art.  And that most of us
>  > know
>  >  > the
>  >  > difference. 
>  >   >>
>  
>  
>  ----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
>  Return-Path: <owner-rat-list@whirl-i-gig.com>
>  Received: from  rly-zb04.mx.aol.com (rly-zb04.mail.aol.com [172.31.41.4])
> by
> air-zb02.mail.aol.com (v56.26) with SMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 1999 22:49:44 -0500
>  Received: from parachute.whirl-i-gig.com ([208.195.236.241])
>  	  by rly-zb04.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
>  	  with ESMTP id WAA27934;
>  	  Thu, 4 Mar 1999 22:49:34 -0500 (EST)
>  Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)
>  	by parachute.whirl-i-gig.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id XAA08339;
>  	Thu, 4 Mar 1999 23:54:03 -0500
>  Received: by parachute.whirl-i-gig.com (bulk_mailer v1.10); Thu, 4 Mar
> 1999
> 23:54:03 -0500
>  Received: (from majordom@localhost)
>  	by parachute.whirl-i-gig.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA08333
>  	for rat-list-outgoing; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 23:54:02 -0500
>  X-Authentication-Warning: parachute.whirl-i-gig.com: majordom set sender
> to
> owner-rat-list@whirl-i-gig.com using -f
>  Received: from mail-la.station.sony.com (mail-la.station.sony.com
> [209.0.234.32])
>  	by parachute.whirl-i-gig.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA08330
>  	for <rat-list@whirl-i-gig.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 23:54:00 -0500
>  Received: by mail-la.station.sony.com with Internet Mail Service
> (5.5.2448.0)
>  	id <GKA6DBFQ>; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 19:49:33 -0800
>  Message-ID:
> <51EC05AE2DD6D111A0CF00805F6F410B57BB99@mail-la.station.sony.com>
>  From: "Sylvain, John" <jsylvain@station.sony.com>
>  To: "'rat-list@whirl-i-gig.com'" <rat-list@whirl-i-gig.com>
>  Subject: RE: RAT I could not have made a bigger blunder if I tired
>  Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 19:49:31 -0800 
>  MIME-Version: 1.0
>  X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
>  Content-Type: text/plain
>  Sender: owner-rat-list@whirl-i-gig.com
>  Reply-To: rat-list@whirl-i-gig.com
>  
>   >>