[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: RAT Re: "Dancing Bear" posts
Amen Nick.
Thanks for that post.
Love,
Allison
--- NOMADMONAD@aol.com wrote:
> At 12:23 PM 11/1/99 -0800, William Houts wrote:
> >
> >Personally, --and I'm certainly guided by my
> current frustration in this--
> the Archives should be guided by an allegiance to
> real and immediate rats
> rather than to a vague and hypothetical posterity.
> >For the record, I heartily recommend a restoration
> of the ability to search
> for posts by particular persons by name. I'm very
> interested in reading past
> posts by such rat luminaries as Chris Jeffries,
> Allison Narver, John
> Sylvain andd...well, modesty forbids.
> >
> >
>
> Bill,
>
> Who are the real and immediate rats? For me they
> are at least as vague and
> hypothetical as posterity is. I can only say who
> are real and immediate to
> me. Those with whom I work and laugh and those with
> whom I hope to work and
> laugh sometime in the future. I assume we all are
> "the real thing, baby" and
> I actively promote our ideas and work into the Icons
> that we will present to
> posterity. Same same.
>
> The mechanical archiving of the rat-list began in
> '99, so the RatBase is the
> only way at the Web site to find pre-1999 posts.
> But not all the posts from
> the WildHistory of the rat-list are archived there,
> only the ones that are
> sources for the "idea quotes" used in the database.
>
>
> Part of the philosophy in creating the RatBase was
> to subvert the paradigm of
> author/authority. Its prejudice is that RAT and RAT
> ideas have multiple
> authors and that a good idea is a good idea
> regardless of whether the source
> is an email listserv or prestigious theater journal
> or newsletter or zine.
> If the author's name search was enabled, the Wizard
> of Oz would be visible
> behind the curtain; i.e., the choices of the Editor
> would be revealed. Ideas
> generated by Erik and Nick dominate. So instead of
> idea land, the RatBase
> would center us in guru land with the paradigm of
> author/authority
> reinforced.
>
> The Editor immerses herself into the disguise of
> ideas. Wise Guise.
>
> The Web and Internet with its multiple digital
> databases such as the RatBase
> excite me because of its challenge to the old
> authorities, especially those
> of print and publishing. These authorities are of
> course quick to adapt and
> reassert their power, but now more than ever rebels
> seem able to set up
> Hakim's Temporary Autonomous Zones at will. Over
> the five years RAT and RAT
> ideas have represented such a zone for me. The
> anarch's responsibility to the
> anarchy is completely different than the monarch's
> responsibility to the
> monarchy, but both are equally selfish/selfless. So
> no apologies for the
> author's name search being disabled.
>
> Under various pseudonyms, I have written endlessly
> on all this, here on the
> rat-list and elsewhere. Most recently I have been
> interested in fame and its
> relationship to identity and image. Specifically,
> is there a way to attain
> the power of the Icon elsewhere than in that so
> boring realm of Blockbuster
> and Brand Name?
>
> Theater is one place to initiate such an
> exploration. But dramaturgy needs
> to examine every aspect of production and the
> cultural ramifications of
> theater to be effective, not just the specific
> aesthetics of a certain
> script. For some the rat-list, the Web site,
> RatBase, the Conferences, and
> RAT itself has been both the medium and reality of
> this examination. A way to
> contextualize the struggles of one's individual
> theater and lives into the
> Big Picture.
>
> The ongoing <www.undermain.com> Web project is now
> exploring many of these
> same ideas. This is the posterity of RAT for those
> involved. It is real and
> immediate. For others BCT in Los Angeles is the
> posterity of RAT. The
> <www.edgeoftheworld.org> Fest is real and immediate.
> I believe other real
> and immediate RAT progeny exist, are ready to exist.
> The authors are various
> and multiple. A seedy, ratty lot to be sure. But
> if I had to name names, I
> couldn't.
>
> --nick
>
=====
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com